Law Enforcement Of The United States - 1589 Words

Organization Management Crystal Peaden 11/16/2015 University of Phoenix CJA/484 Mr. David Mailloux Law enforcement in the United States is an extremely large and complex area comprising of over 23,000 local, state and federal agencies working alongside security service providers, and industry that hires more than one million people. Among the over 90,000 officially declared police personnel, 13% are specifically working for federal agencies, another 13% hired by special or state agencies while 74% work in the local law enforcement agencies. These law enforcement agents are mandated with various roles and responsibilities, with the main aim of protecting the society. These responsibilities include prevention of crime, maintenance of law and order, and public service. The agencies are segmented into federal, state and local agencies. However, they operate in unison towards controlling, deterring and fighting crime, although, in certain situations, every agency may work independently from the others. It should be noted that all the levels of law enforcement are governed by outlined s et of rules, responsibilities and procedures (Carter, 2004). The local policing agencies are made up of the local police, sheriff’s department, campus police as well as the municipal and park police. They are all charged with the duty of protecting societal needs like patrol work, traffic duties, response to calls for service and provision of general help to the public. They areShow MoreRelatedLaw Enforcement Of The United States1333 Words   |  6 PagesJuan Lopez Ms. Dennaoui English 12 23 April 2015 Law Enforcement Imagine if there was no type of law enforcement code for a month in your city. Crime rates will be at an all-time high. People would have no sort of protection or stability. There would also be no one to control the people; no one will ensure peace amongst the people. Thanks to our police officers all of these possible dangerous situations are kept under control on a daily basis. Police officers put their lives on the line each dayRead MoreLaw Enforcement : The United States Essay1595 Words   |  7 PagesWe the People Law enforcement was designed in the early 1800’s by a man named Robert Peal, which is why cops are sometimes referred to as Bobbies in England; designing an organization of law enforcement that would protect people from harming other people (Christ). This was the model that we based our western law enforcement agencies on, until prohibition became a federal task in the 1920’s. This is when the federal government decided to take up the task of protecting people from themselves. FastRead MoreThe United States Law Enforcement Essay1981 Words   |  8 PagesLaw enforcement goes as far back as to cave dwellers, if it was not for England, the United States would be at a lost for policing. The United States uses the consensus and conflict theories to help the American people have a better understanding of human behavior and its limits. There are many types of policing that were identified and it is the law enforcement officers’ job to protect and sever and to delive r criminals into the hands of the law. If it was not for law enforcement officers, theRead MoreThe Law Enforcement Of The United States Essay1510 Words   |  7 PagesIn today’s society it seems as if all the violence that is occurring is revolved around race. Negative law enforcement involvement has been one of the major controversial topics that our generation has been faced with. Race, violence and authority is a very well-known racial disparity that will take some time to be seen otherwise. After the incidents occur, what really shakes the nation is that there is no real accountability. No one wants to admit that an injustice occurred and a small altercationRead MoreUnited States Law Enforcement Officers Essay2078 Words   |  9 PagesIntroduction: United States Law Enforcement officers are constantly under pressure. Their job requires them to serve and protect mankind, under any circumstances, at all times. Because of this, officers run the risk of putting themselves in harmful situation. This may include apprehending a violent assailant, or entering harmful locations. In this study, I used books and articles such as, Criminal Justice Today, to get an understanding of the dangers Law Enforcement Officer face in the lineRead MoreLaw Enforcement Within The United States2953 Words   |  12 Pages Law Enforcement officers have one of the most critical jobs in the United States. Their lives are always on the line and they are of high regards. This means they cannot fail! The results of their jobs do not only depend on their actions but also on the people. What this means is the community has a huge role when it comes to solving crime. Though many people may not believe it, they are the key to a successful crime prevention community. The people of the United States don’t really understand bothRead MoreLaw Enforcement : The United States Sole Purpose1117 Words   |  5 PagesHonors 30 April 2015 Law Enforcement Corruption Law enforcement in the United States sole purpose is to ensure the safety and abiding of laws by all citizens. Though law enforcement try to act as if they conform to such things, has the police system gone corrupt? As far back as one can remember that have been numerous attacks of Caucasian police officers brutally mistreating and killing African Americans, most of which are unarmed. Is there a deeper meaning as to why law enforcement are acting so unethicalRead MoreHomeland Security : The United States And Law Enforcement3125 Words   |  13 PagesHomeland Security in the United States and law enforcement and how they are integrated. I hope after reading this paper you will be well informed on the duties and responsibilities of these agencies. People have always lived in fear but with the help of these agencies we will no longer have to live in fear. I will try to give as much detail information as possible to help with any problems or situation that might come up. Homeland Secur ity in the United States and law enforcement have extensive researchRead MoreLaw Enforcement Agencies And Its Effects On The United States999 Words   |  4 PagesBite and hold or bark and hold? Law enforcement agencies across the country have tried to balance the ever explosive decision of using force on a suspect who flees. Continually battling public concerns that seem to favor the suspect over the officer, many departments have changed their policy on the canine units that they employ. K-9 officers are more than tools to their handlers, they are their companions, and partners. Now, groups like the ACLU have targeted the use of K-9’s in the apprehensionRead MoreThe Ambassadors of Law Enforcement: The History of the United States Marshalls1661 Words   |  7 PagesThe Ambassadors of Law Enforcement: The History of the United States Marshals There is a very rich history surrounding the United States Marshals; beginning with the lawlessness that spread throughout the land. On any given day, a western can be televised showing how the cowboys and other outlaws ran amuck and terrorized the people. The President decided it was time to do something about all of the crime and lawlessness that existed, hence, the U.S. Marshals Service. In 1790 the Marshals Service

Agenda Setting Theory Free Essays

Define and illustrate (i. e. , give examples of) agenda-setting theory. We will write a custom essay sample on Agenda Setting Theory or any similar topic only for you Order Now How might a president try to use the media’s presumed agenda-setting powers near election time? In other words, might it behoove a president to take (or threaten to take) certain highly dramatic actions-especially concerning foreign affairs- just before an election that will impact strongly on the power of his/her political party? If so, what actions might a president be likely to take and under what circumstances? (For example, would the likelihood of taking such actions depend on how the economy is doing? Explain.Would it matter whether business scandals, the budget deficit, crime patterns or a previously initiated war were detracting from the president’s popularity? When would a president tend to refrain from taking such actions at election time? ) Support each claim you make with evidence and/or reasoning. Agenda Setting Theory is creating public awareness by using the news media. It is a powerful influence the media holds, and it’s used to persuade people into thinking that a story is important, when in reality it may not be. The functions of agenda-setting are: media agenda, public agenda, policy agenda, and corporate agenda.The media agenda can be discussed through newspapers, television and radios. Public agendas cover issues regarding members of the public. Policy agenda cover issues which policy makers consider to be important, and corporate agenda are issues which big business and corporations consider important. According to Bernard C. Cohen, â€Å"the media doesn’t tell us what to think; it tells us what to think about†. This takes us to the two levels of agenda setting; the first level explains that the media influences people by suggesting what people should think about.The second level is focused on how people should think about the issue. This theory is very powerful, because if people are exposed to the same media, they will be persuaded to feel the same way towards it. But this influence can also affect people in a negative way, because the media exaggerates issues resulting in the people not always getting the facts. As for the President Utilizesing the media’s dramatic emphasis on the economies downward spiral, a President or presidential candidate would likely focus his media use in a positive way. He can use the valence principle, as far s ensuring to discuss the topics being targeted by the media in his favor. As I mentioned earlier, if the media is negatively discussing an issue, the President can try to turn things around, so that he can get the people on his side. As we all know, there are multiple ways to view the media and see what events are happening in the world around us. Being that we as Americans are in a recession, a President or candidate would probably want to steer away from supporting corporations or businesses that are hording taxpayers money over oil spills, environmentally hazardous accidents, or natural resources being wasted away.What I’m trying to say is that, in a presidential speech, or campaign speech, taking the supportive side of something that is worsening our economic state would hurt the chances of a successful presidency. For example, if a President wanted to persuade us to support his new healthcare proposal, he would likely manipulate the medias impact on our views by displaying and airing various commercials and programs which bring light to certai n hospitals, or health policies rise in providing wider more sufficient care to certain families without sharing certain details like their social status or insurance coverage.At the same time one could throw numbers, statistics, and positive increases in this health care plan all over the media to show and beat one side of the story in the American people. When you bring in the view of the relationship between the salience of a story, and the extent to which people think that this story is important, one can easy portray that people will attribute importance of an issue by how often the media exposes it. Political scandals will probably never stop as long as we have greedy, unfocused leaders.A prime example is Senator Blagojevich, who served as the 40th Governor of Illinois from 2003 to 2009, ended up being arrested on federal corruption charges. He was charged of conspiracy to commit mail, wire fraud, and solicitation bribery. These events surrounded him not long ago, and were all over the media both news and entertainment related. Would it affect the President in a negative way if he went on air and supported this official?Absolutely; in addition, the President would need to create media coverage in his favor showing that he not only does not condone these actions and behaviors, but is already planning to introduce new leadership which will propose some positive swing to the people. And guess how he could manipulate that negative event into a healthy bit of coverage? By using the media to air this over and over again so we can see the importance of his new leadership proposals. (w ww. chicagotribune. om) In Closing, agenda setting in relation to the President and his views or position in any situation is a common and reoccurring thing. With advances in technology being at a constant, we can expect to see the future Presidents and leaders use the media to their advantage. As long as some type of media exists, the people will be manipulated in one way or another. This means that political parties should constantly be aware of the things that they do, and continue to remind themselves that any mistake they make can end their careers as we know it. How to cite Agenda Setting Theory, Papers

Racial Ideologies of the New World free essay sample

Starting in 1450, Europeans have sought for alternative routes for direct access to Asian markets in order to cut out the Islamic intermediaries in between. In doing so, they expanded their knowledge and began to colonize the world. At the same time, in East Asia, the Qing dynasty brought a golden age to China, reestablishing Korea as a tributary state after the Ming Dynasty closed China off from the world. Spain, Portugal, France, and the Netherlands were the primary participants in world colonization that started as an effort to expand after the discovery of the New World (Americas). When the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 was established, the world was split into two for the two major believers of Christianity. Anything west of the line of Tordesillas belonged to the Spanish while anything to the east belonged to the Portuguese. Spain and Portugal quickly established a strict social structure that is defined by birth and ancestry consisted of the indigenous peoples, slaves, the conquerors, and their children in Latin America. In North America, however, the English who settled did not assimilate into the native society as easily as the Spanish and Portuguese in Latin America. Instead, they stayed isolated from the natives most of the time. In fact, the English settlers had no intention of ever mingling themselves among the natives nor were they openly welcome to the natives in their towns. Despite this, the racial ideologies of both North American and Latin American settlers were very similar. Racial prejudice was a major factor that shaped the separation of social classes in the New World. Ultimately, these prejudice ideologies led to the decline of European autocratic rule over their colonies in the New World, and Africans as well due to racial prejudices that were prevalent throughout the European societies. The differences in social hierarchy in North America and Latin America is a direct result of the fact that the English settlers in North America arrived in the New World with different intentions than that of the Spanish conquistadores in Latin America. The English arrived in the New World with hopes of starting a new life, and planned to stay there for a long time to come. To achieve this, the English brought their women over along with men and children. As a result, they did not need to interact with the indigenous peoples of North America to reproduce. In Latin America, on the other hand, the Spanish and Portuguese did not arrive in the New World with intentions to colonize. In fact, they did not plan to stay at all. The Spanish and Portuguese arrived in the New World in hopes of making a large profit before taking it home and spend it luxuriously. Therefore, they did not bother to bring their own women with the men. However, the Spanish soon found themselves staying longer than intended. Many entered relationships with the natives, giving birth to children of mixed heritage that were known as mestizos. With many people born of mixed heritage, they were all classified into social classes based on how closely related they are to whites. The closer they are, the higher in the social pyramid they are. However, society in North American colonies are not defined by birth the way Latin America is due to the fact that there is a lack of those born of mixed heritage. The bulk of society in North America is composed of European colonists, while the bulk in Latin America is composed of mestizos and mixes, along with indigenous and slave populations. In both North America and Latin America, there is an extreme power difference between the white Europeans and the natives, slaves, and mixes. The situation was worse in Latin America, since the peninsulares and creoles made up much less than a quarter of the population. This became a problem later when Enlightenment ideas sparked revolutions such as the Haitian Revolution. The major source of labor in Latin America came from the conquered and enslaved natives. These laborers were organized into several labor systems such as the engenho, mita, hacienda, and encomienda systems. However, the Valladolid debates between Bartolome de las Casas and Juan Gines de Sepulveda was held. De las Casas won the debate and declared that the indigenous peoples of Latin America were civilized people who were forced into subjugation by the Spanish and did not need Spanish masters in order to be civilized. He supports his ideas with the fact that the indigenous peoples of Latin America already had complex societies of their own before the arrival of the Spanish. Soon, the natives gained some rights, though no where close to the rights that the peninsulares and creoles held. The Spanish imported African slaves in numerous quantities, mostly to make up for the high mortality rates and low birth rates among the slaves. The slaves were supervised by Spanish masters and worked in plantations and mines. Due to such large amounts of slaves, when the slave trade was closed off, Latin America faced serious shortages in laborers. In North America, however, the settlers had little to no chance to subjugate the indigenous peoples. It was much easier in Latin America because of the fact that the indigenous peoples were already in settled societies. However, the natives of North America were nomadic and did not interact with the Europeans often. As a result, the settlers in North America were mostly on their own. The major source of labor in North America were indentured laborers. Indentured laborers were made up mostly of the unwanted people of society in England such as criminals and people who have nothing left to lose in Europe. These people were given a chance in the New World to start a new life, and in return for the free transport over, they work for the people who paid for their trip until their debt is paid off. When slaves were introduced to North America, they were used on plantations in the southern colonies to harvest cash crops such as cotton. Unlike Latin America, North American colonies did not have a very high death rate of slaves. Instead, they were taken care of and reproduced quickly, saving the colonists a large amount of money since they did not need to import slaves continuously. Despite such differences, slaves and natives were at the bottom of society in both North America and Latin America. Although de las Casas views on the natives helped change the status of the indigenous peoples in Latin America, his ideas did not travel as far as Europe so his voice was left mostly unheard in English colonies. However, like early Latin America, North American colonies did exploit the natives to some point. They used the method of treaty and contracts to gain land. They took land from the natives, sometimes by force even. The colonists were originally fine with fishing and sending seafood back to Europe. However, they needed another source of income, and eventually began to use the natives hunting skills to capture a beaver for its fur. The more inland the English went for trade, the further back the natives were pushed from their home lands. This, in turn, led to numerous wars and conflicts between the many tribes scattered over the wilderness of North America, causing major decline in native populations. Perhaps the most important similarity between North and Latin American societies is that the European whites are prejudiced against the natives. They believed they were superior to these barbarians who the settlers never had any interactions with before. They believed that the natives were uncivilized, barbaric, and savages who have no sense for order. In Latin America, the indigenous people were subjugated by force. The Spanish even demanded that a certain amount of men from each tribe must spend a few months a year in the mines. Naturally, all profits went to the Spanish government. In North America, however, the whites did not even bother to conquer the natives. They stayed separate from them except for the occasions on which they met to trade fur, land, and other products. They looked down on those who engage in relationships with natives. Even when getting converts to Christianity, the settlers did not welcome the natives. Though they were not against converts, they did not actively pursue converts among the natives. On the other hand, the missionaries in Latin America worked actively to gain many converts to Roman Catholic Christianity, giving them more chances to interact with the natives.